"In some sections of A.A., anonymity is carried to the point of real absurdity. Members are on such a poor basis of communication that they don't even know each other's last names or where each lives. It's like the cell of an underground."
Bill W. in a letter, 1959 at p 241, "As Bill Sees It."


Undue Anonymity
At first, this anonymity business made sense, but then I wondered if it also impaired the ability to communicate among ourselves.
Then I heard a Joe & Charlie tape where Charlie Parmin gave his first and last name. He apparently thought it fitting to introduce himself in a roomful of people who came to hear him talk.
Then I read material on the website of the Primary Purpose Group of Dallas - and there's this guy, Cliff B., who authors some truly interesting and thought-provoking material. I like knowing who the author is because it is customary in all my other activities. Should professionals and academics like economists present their ideas without associating the idea with their identity? "Wealth of Nations" by Adam S.? Is it always necessary and appropriate for one to refrain from properly identifying himself while addressing a troubling problem, alcoholism & the solution(s) if one qualifies as a member of Alcoholics Anonymous? Is it necessary to repudiate ones membership while retaining faith in the 12-Step program of recovery?